I was watching Good Morning America and saw the strangest
method for making fried chicken that I have ever seen. I am not going to try it
so I can’t say if it is any good or not but since I have had almost all of my
friends rave about my fried chicken and call me for the recipe I see no reason
to try a recipe that takes 4 times longer than mine and is way messier. The
secret to me to perfect fried chicken is a very spicy and crispy skin, it can
be done quite simply which is sort of the key to the perfection of it. I use
about 13 spices on the chicken before I dust it with only flour and I put it in
hot oil and cook on one side without turning it with the lid on it for 20
minutes and then take the lid off and leave it off so that when I turn the
chicken over it will get crispy while the second side cooks. It is quick, easy
and foolproof. No messy dredging it in buttermilk, which adds more calories and
isn’t needed if you use the right spices and make sure the oil is hot when you
put the chicken in it. The recipe the guy on GMA cooked called for you to
precook the chicken for 2 and a half hours before you dip it in a buttermilk
batter and then fry it. Yes you only fry it for 6 minutes but why? You get the
same amount of calories in 6 minutes as you do in 40 and you had to heat your
whole house up for 2 hours while you unnecessarily baked the chicken to cook it
before frying it. Isn’t it kind of silly to make twice cooked cooked chicken?
Besides that why would I want to spend 3 hours cooking fried chicken when from
start to finish mine only takes an hour and everyone I know thinks it is
perfect? I don’t get it I guess. If you ever try this recipe please let me know
if it is better than my method which is a lot of people’s method!
No comments:
Post a Comment